Evaluating Hypotheses to Find out Group Variations MHA FPX 5107 Assessment 2 Hypothesis Testing for Differences between Groups

In a similar vein, healthcare professionals can assess performance levels against benchmarks, predict the results of their decisions, and manage the complexity of healthcare environments by utilising statistical approaches, particularly hypothesis testing. Healthcare management can compare patient outcomes, examine organisational efficiencies across departments or facilities, and objectively assess the efficacy of therapies by using hypothesis testing. This method not only facilitates data-driven decision-making but also improves the capacity to pinpoint areas in need of development.

Adoption of best practices can be guided, for instance, by using statistical tests to compare the effectiveness of various treatment protocols or patient care initiatives. In the end, these statistical techniques assist professionals in making well-informed choices that maximize organizational performance, resource allocation, and patient care (Wang & Ji, 2020).

Conclusion

The given data was analysed using the t-test, a useful technique for comparing two groups by evaluating the variation in their means. The test’s findings show that Clinic 2 and Clinic 1 have a statistically significant difference in the number of monthly patient visits. It is highly advised that the investor think about purchasing Clinic 2 as the better choice in light of this significant performance difference.

References 

Clinical Analytics and Data Management for the DNP. (2023). Google Books. https://books.google.com.pk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=ZKucEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA275&dq=Independent+Sample+t-Test&ots=KxG-USUFIt&sig=DlSsV3o2OSRKK3DiOuLjpI_U1cU&redir_esc=y

Keysers, C., Gazzola, V., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2020). Using Bayes factor hypothesis testing in neuroscience to establish evidence of absence. Nature Neuroscience, 23(7), 788–799. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-0660-4

Li, H. (2024). A Distributed Independent Sample T-Test Protocol for Privacy Protection in Smart Healthcare. Proceedings of the 2024 4th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Intelligent Computing, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3665689.3665690

MacFarland, T. W., & Yates, J. M. (2020). Student’s t-Test for Independent Samples. Springer EBooks, 141–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62404-0_3

Okoye, K., & Hosseini, S. (2024). T-test Statistics in R: Independent Samples, Paired Sample, and One Sample T-tests. 159–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-3385-9_8

Talwar, S., Dhir, A., Singh, D., Virk, G. S., & Salo, J. (2020). Sharing of fake news on social media: Application of the honeycomb framework and the third-person effect hypothesis Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 57(102197), 102197.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102197

Tian, Y., & Cao, N. (2023, December 1). Case Study on the Application of Information Technology in Physical Education Teaching Based on Independent Sample T test. IEEE Xplore. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCS59553.2023.10455452

Vankelecom, L., Loeys, T., & Beatrijs Moerkerke. (2024). How to Safely Reassess Variability and Adapt Sample Size? A Primer for the Independent Samples t Test. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459231212128

Wang, X., & Ji, X. (2020). Sample Size Estimation in Clinical Research: From Randomized Controlled Trials to Observational Studies. CHEST, 158(1), S12–S20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.010

Wu, C., Yang, M., & Chen, H. (2020). Inhibition effect of miR-150 on the progression of oral squamous cell carcinoma by data analysis model based on independent sample T-test. Saudi Journal of Biological Sci